A few blog posts ago, I wrote about the cut John Adams rap, and why Lin-Manuel Miranda chose to remove it from the show. The conclusion that I came to was that it was cut for the sake of perspicuity; the rap is ultimately redundant and takes up unnecessary stage time, as well as being targeted toward a character that never actually appears in person on stage throughout the entire show.
But upon further thought, I realized that this logic completely falls apart when you examine another aspect of the show- that of King George III. He has three songs to himself, all of which are solo numbers, and he never interacts with another character outside of that- hell, he's never even featured on stage outside of his ballads. With the Adams rap, it was half of one song ("The Adams Administration") that was cut, but in this instance, it's three full songs that are fairly inconsequential in the scheme of things- not only that, but really King George's entire character could be cut from the show and none of the other characters would really be affected. The only character that is stated to have interaction with George is John Adams, who, as you'll recall, isn't actually in the show.
But I think that there's a fundamental difference between George's songs and the Adams rap. No other songs in the show are anything like the Brit-pop pseudo-love ballads that the monarch spouts every so often during relevant events in the chronology of the show. They are both lyrically and musically different from everything else in the show, and cutting it denies the show the variety that these songs very effectively inspire.
An interesting thing to think about for sure and I agree with you that cutting George would certainly taking a lot out of the play. I also think that he is used as the antagonist for the first part of the play since he is against Hamilton and the colonists. I also posted a topic similar to this that talks about how George's numbers shows us a non American perspective of events in the play/history.
ReplyDeleteI dunno, I think that the King George songs were meant to toss in a bit of humor, since I perceive him as mocking the Americans, as well as let people know what the infamous King George III was thinking at the time.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Zach that King George offers important comic relief. However, I also think that a big part of King George's character is to serve as an outside narrator of events (one of the reasons John Adams was unnecessary was that King George transitioned us into the Adams presidency and gave us background on him) as well as a point of comparison. The American freedom-fighter rappers seem much cooler when juxtaposed with a stiff, carefully articulated soloist.
ReplyDelete